NO MAN IS WISER THAN LAW
LEAVING
aside the debate on legitimacy of death penalty, the concern herein is the authority
of an Institution. The Supreme Court of India after hearing contention and
arguments advanced by counsel for Yakub held him guilty and punished him with
Death penalty for Bombay Blast in year 1993. After the verdict, many people stated
that the Supreme Court has not followed proper procedure and some of them gave it
a communal colour by stating that Yakub has been hanged because he belongs to a
minority community.
Such
things are unfortunate and strictly speaking one should not have questioned the
institution and its honesty. If we look around the world, there is massive
distrust in the Institution and Masses feel joyous whenever someone questions
the integrity of the Institution. For any society to survive and grow, it has
to believe in Rule of Law as every human being is inherently possess different
behavioral patterns and act differently in a given situation and Rule of Law
provides common and agreeable behavior for different human being.
Article
14 of the Constitution provides that the State shall not deny to any person
equality before the law or equal protection of law within the territory of
India and Right to life under Article 21, which shall not be deprived from him
except in accordance with law. The same institution i.e. S.C. has held that
equality cannot be claimed to legitimize an illegal action[1] and a
punishment which is too cruel or torturesome is unconstitutional[2] and
devised rarest of rare principle in death penalty.
Yakub’s
death sentence was confirmed by the SC vide Judgment dated 21.03.2013,
thereafter he filled a Review Petition (Crl) No.474/2013 which was dismissed by
SC on 30.07.2013 and Mercy Petition filled through his brother was rejected by
President on 11.04.2014 admittedly same remain unchallenged, however, in terms
of the Constitutional Bench Judgment in Shatrughan Chauhan & Ors[3] his
Review Petition was again heard for at least 10 days while the norm is hearing
of 30 Minutes and dismissed by SC on 09.04.2015. Wheel did not stop here and he
filed a Curative Petition that was dismissed by Supreme Court on 21.07.2015.
Meanwhile he filed 2nd Mercy Petition with President and a Writ
Petition before Supreme Court, which was rejected and dismissed on 29.07.2015 by
President and Supreme Court and he again filed another Writ that was dismissed
by SC in early hours of 30.07.2015.
Therefore
one cannot and should not say that sufficient opportunity of being heard has
not been provided to him and Principle of Natural Justice has not been
followed. If one questions, in my view either his thoughts are biased or there
is other mitigating circumstances and compulsion. Individuals in democratic
society have the right to live under a system that operates within the Rule of
Law that acts effectively and fairly within commonly accepted norms. For
Institution to flourish, they should demonstrate to citizens that they are trustworthy
and that they possess the authority to Govern.[4]
The
Supreme Court in the case of Yakub has clearly demonstrated that it is
trustworthy and if situation demand can work extraordinarily and has authority
to Govern and impose Rule of Law. If someone is questing authority of SC, he is
basically defying the Rule of law and Constitution of India because no man
ought to be wiser than the law (Neminem
Opportet Esse Sapientiorem Legibus).
Comments