Theatre & Dramatic Performances Act, 1876
In
December last year, Parliament passed the Repealing and Amending (Second) Bill,
2017 whereby various obsolete Laws were repealed, one of the significant act
which was in law books since 1876 was also repealed which had given headache to
the theatre artist for more than century. The Act was implemented by British
Government to prohibit public dramatic performances, which are scandalous,
defamatory, seditious or obscene. Modern Indian theatre was developed during
the colonial era and in order to resist its use as an instrument of protest
against colonial rule, the British Government had passed the said Act. In the
year 1858-1860, Dinabandhu Mitra wrote a play Nil “Darpan “which brought
anti-british subject matter to the general public depicting colonial planters
ruthlessly oppressing poor peasants and Rev.James Long who translated the play
in English was fined and imprisoned in the year 1861. In 1876, soon after
Edward, the Prince of Wales, visited Calcutta, the Great National Theatre
presented a blatant persiflage titled Gajadananda O Jubaraj (or Gajadananda and
The Crown Prince) which sought to target Jagadananda Mukherjee, a Government
Pleader (Advocate) and Member of Bengal Legislative Council who had invited the
Prince into his family house[1].
Thereafter, Police had proscribed many play and to tethered various theatre
personality and intellect class, Governor-General promulgated an ordinance
prohibiting performances “prejudicial to the public interest”. Although
prominent citizens and the press protested against the Proposed bill despite
this, Government passed the Dramatic Performances Act, 1876 on 16th
December 1876, empowering the Government to prohibit plays which are
scandalous, defamatory, seditious or obscene. The Police was empowered to enter,
arrest, and seize scenery, dresses, etc. It was also provided under the Act
that a dramatic performance in specified area had to receive a license and a copy
of the piece, if written, shall be furnished to the authorities. Despite the
law being draconian, it remain in statute book till date, however, Allahabad
High Court in the case of State Vs Baboo Lal & Ors reported at
MANU/UP/0188/1956 and later on Punjab High Court in the case of Comrade Chanan
Singh, Secretary District Kisan Sabha Vs Union of India reported at
MANU/PH/0287/1960 held that held that the whole Dramatic Performances Act 1876
is ultra vires of the Constitution of India, because its procedural part
imposes such restrictions on the right of freedom of speech and expression
which cannot be covered by the saving Clause in Article 19(2) of the
Constitution. Their Lordships have held that by leaving the matter entirely to
the subjective determination of the District Magistrate it has denied the
essential minimum requirements of natural justice, namely the right to be heard
before final condemnation and the right to have the order reviewed and
objectively determined by higher tribunal judicial or otherwise. The Government
did not file any appeal against the aforesaid Judgments, however, despite being
declared ultra vires to the Constitution, the Act was part of statute which
anomaly has been rectified by the aforesaid repealing Bill passed by the
Parliament.
#theatre #DPA #freedomofSpeech
[1]https://books.google.co.in/books?id=SCtEDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT195&lpg=PT195&dq=prince+of+wales+National+theatre+india+1876&source=bl&ots=Kf_Ef3qh6d&sig=apso8wRjCFrZcBq8T78rAUnHIzE&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj7wO7ztqjZAhWMMY8KHZ06AJ4Q6AEIUDAH#v=onepage&q=prince%20of%20wales%20National%20theatre%20india%201876&f=false
Comments