Proposed amendment in Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

Government has proposed to amend certain provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 vide Amendment Bill, 2009. It is our endeavour to provide the summary of the bill in simple words. The Bill proposes to increase the ceiling under Section 2(s)(iv) from Rs.1600/- to Rs.10,000/-, at present, person who is working in supervisory position and earning more than Rs.1600/- is not workmen, however situation will be changed after this. Bill further propose to insert a New Chapter-IIB requiring to setup a Grievance Redressal Committee by an establishment employing more than 20 workers, for resolution of dispute arising out of individual grievances. Further a significant change which is being proposed that all awards, order shall be executed in accordance with the procedure laid down for execution of orders or decree of a civil court under Order-XXI of CPC.

www.vlaindia.com

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Independence Day, It is one leave! Boss

It is only a decade ago when I was studying in school in a small town of Uttar Pradesh. Only thing which I can visualize is that I become much older (it is thought full). I still remember that on Independence Day, our school used to celebrate the national function and we young students used to participate in the Independence Day’s parade at our Tehsil Ground. Every teachers and students were full of feelings of patriotism, but now Independence Day becomes a holiday. radically our mind set has changes. on this day (since it is leave) we can wind up our pending list of matters, can take rest at home, watch movies, etc. etc. No one wants to sacrifice its day for the country. Yes we have grown up. In Delhi, I have seen new trend, Schools do its duties of celebrating the Independence Day on 14th August, and Teachers do not want to waste their precious leave of a day. So they do their part of duties on 14th August and we too get relaxed, fine today is leave from office!. Why do we require a ...
Read more
Dated: 26.09.2013 To, Hon’ble Sh.Pranab Mukherjee The President of India Rashtrapati Bhavan, New Delhi-110004 Subject:      Representation on Representation of Peoples (Amendment) Bill, 2013 (“Ordinance”) Dear Sir, This is in reference to the captioned subject matter wherein Government of India in its Cabinet meeting has decided to negate the Judgment dated 10.07.2013 of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Chief Election Commissioner Vs Jan Chaukidar & Others (Civil Appeal No.3040-3041 of 2004) by promulgating the aforesaid Ordinance. In the said Judgment, Hon’ble Apex Court has declared that a person who has no right to vote by virtue of sub-section (5) of Section 62 of the Said Act, is not elector and is therefore, not qualified to contest the election to either house of Parliament or the Legislative Assembly of a State. It is correct that under Article 123 of the Constitution of India, Hon’ble President of India has power to pr...
Read more

Politics of perception & defamation

Enlightment thinkers have rejected the authoriity of medieval belief in divine rights of King and upheld the freedom of individual to think for themselves. Rene Descartes say I think, therefore I am. Enlightment thinker also feels that people should have a say in their government. The elections are basically seeking a collective say of the people in governance. Does it happen realy? Or people are forced by the Political Parties, to think, the way, party want? I am of the view that the Political Strategist are capable to force the people to think, the way, they want. This collective thinking or hypnotism or mesmire, which is being created by the parties over a period of time can be referred to as Political Wave or rather we can say that selected information disseminated by a political outfilt against its political opponent plays a pivotal role in election. We must have noticed that whenever Election Commission of India declare, dates for election, people start getting s...
Read more